Ngaim Ruo Ling

Ngaim Ruo Ling is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in collective sales and real estate. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ngaim Ruo Ling has demonstrated expertise across 6 primary practice areas, with significant experience in collective sales and real estate.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Collective Sales	2 cases	22% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ngaim Ruo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	22% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ngaim Ruo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	22% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Ngaim Ruo Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ngaim Ruo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ngaim Ruo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ngaim Ruo Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ngaim Ruo Ling has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Donaldson & Burkinshaw LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Yeo Sok Hoon v Tan Thiam Chye: Collective Sale Dispute over Realty Centre(Oct 2020) Low Kwang Tong v Karen Teo Mei Ling: Strata Titles, Collective Sales Dispute(Nov 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ngaim Ruo Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ngaim Ruo Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	245,000.00	122,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yeo Sok Hoon v Tan Thiam Chye: Collective Sale Dispute over Realty Centre 05 Oct 2020 Paul Go Kian Lee (Plaintiff)Won	05 Oct 2020	Paul Go Kian Lee (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffApplication for collective sale order allowed; costs of S$70,000 and disbursements of S$53,525.54 awarded to the plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Low Kwang Tong v Karen Teo Mei Ling: Strata Titles, Collective Sales Dispute 28 Nov 2018 Low Kwang Tong (Appellant)Lost	28 Nov 2018	Low Kwang Tong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the appellant is ordered to pay the respondents costs of $35,000 (inclusive of disbursements) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).