Nicholas Beetsma

Nicholas Beetsma is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and evidence law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nicholas Beetsma has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nicholas Beetsma has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Beetsma has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Beetsma has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Beetsma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Beetsma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Beetsma has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Beetsma has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Beetsma has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Beetsma has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nicholas Beetsma has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Lin Lifen v PP: False Statements, Immigration Act & Penal Code Offences(Oct 2015)
CLASIS LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Asplenium Land v Lam Chye Shing: Legal Professional Privilege for In-House Counsel(Feb 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nicholas Beetsma's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nicholas Beetsma's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Asplenium Land v Lam Chye Shing: Legal Professional Privilege for In-House Counsel 21 Feb 2019 RLB Consultancy Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	21 Feb 2019	RLB Consultancy Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application AllowedApplication allowed; declaratory and injunctive reliefs granted in respect of the Item 3 and Item 4 documents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lin Lifen v PP: False Statements, Immigration Act & Penal Code Offences 25 Oct 2015 Lin Lifen (Appellant)Partial	25 Oct 2015	Lin Lifen (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was partly allowed, with a reduction in the sentences for the second and sixth charges.