Nicholas Chng

Nicholas Chng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and corporate law. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nicholas Chng has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and business litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Express Warranties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Exclusion Clauses	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Chng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nicholas Chng has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Hector Finance Group Ltd v Chan Chew Keak: Director's Duties & Conspiracy(May 2023) Bharat Forge v Bombardier: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Aircraft Maintenance(Jul 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nicholas Chng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nicholas Chng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
RMB	14,000,000.00	14,000,000.001 cases	1
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hector Finance Group Ltd v Chan Chew Keak: Director's Duties & Conspiracy 25 May 2023 Huizhou Xinsheng Paper Industry Co. Limited (Plaintiff)Won	25 May 2023	Huizhou Xinsheng Paper Industry Co. Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the second plaintiff in the amount of RMB 14,000,000 for breach of duty of diligence.
2	Bharat Forge v Bombardier: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Aircraft Maintenance 28 Jul 2022 Bombardier Aerospace Services Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Jul 2022	Bombardier Aerospace Services Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.