Nicholas Kam

Nicholas Kam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in security for costs and costs. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nicholas Kam has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Express Trust	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Equitable Mortgage	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Equitable Charge	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Kam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nicholas Kam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	SBS Holdings Inc v Anant Kumar Choudary: Security for Costs Application(Oct 2024) Acute Result Holdings v CGS-CIMB: Resulting Trusts, Negligence & Duty of Care(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nicholas Kam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Unknown	17.0 parties avg	7.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nicholas Kam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Unknown	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Unknown: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SBS Holdings Inc v Anant Kumar Choudary: Security for Costs Application 10 Oct 2024 Shalini Choudary (Respondent)	10 Oct 2024	Shalini Choudary (Respondent): -
2	Acute Result Holdings v CGS-CIMB: Resulting Trusts, Negligence & Duty of Care 27 Feb 2022 CGS-CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd (formerly known as CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd) (Defendant)Won	27 Feb 2022	CGS-CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd (formerly known as CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed.