Nicholas Ong

Nicholas Ong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and intellectual property law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nicholas Ong has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and patents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Patents	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trade names	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Registration criteria	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Distinctiveness	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Experiments	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conflicts with earlier marks	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nicholas Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nicholas Ong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Amica Law LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Discovery of Documents in Patent Litigation(Aug 2018) Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement, Novelty, and Pleadings(Oct 2017) Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd: Trade Mark Dispute over CAESARSTONE Mark(Apr 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nicholas Ong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	22.7 parties avg	2.7	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nicholas Ong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	540,000.00	270,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Discovery of Documents in Patent Litigation 26 Aug 2018 Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	26 Aug 2018	Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Specific discovery granted in partRequest 2 (limited) and Request 4(i) granted. Request 4(ii) disallowed, but explanation on affidavit ordered. Requests 3, 5, and 6 disallowed.
2	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement, Novelty, and Pleadings 18 Oct 2017 Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant, Respondent)Partial	18 Oct 2017	Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant, Respondent): Combination Requests and Passage Requests allowedPlaintiff's application for further and better particulars of the Defence and Counterclaim and the Particulars of Objection was partially successful.
3	Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd: Trade Mark Dispute over CAESARSTONE Mark 25 Apr 2017 CERAMICHE CAESAR SPA (Appellant)Won	25 Apr 2017	CERAMICHE CAESAR SPA (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the Respondent’s CAESARSTONE Mark shall not proceed to registration. The Respondent shall pay the Appellant its disbursements and half its costs here and below. For the avoidance of doubt, the latter includes the costs of: (a) this appeal; (b) the hearing before the Judge and; (c) the hearing before the PAR. The costs and disbursements are to be taxed if not agreed. We also make the usual consequential order for the payment out of the security. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Clearlab SG Pte Ltd v Ma Zhi: Appeal on Costs Order Requires Leave 19 May 2016 LI YUEXIN (Respondent)Won	19 May 2016	LI YUEXIN (Respondent): Costs Order upheldJudge’s Costs Order in favour of the respondents in the sum of $270,000 excluding disbursements was upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.