Nicholas Poon Guokun

Nicholas Poon Guokun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and limitation. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nicholas Poon Guokun has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Poon Guokun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicholas Poon Guokun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nicholas Poon Guokun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Poon Guokun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Poon Guokun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Poon Guokun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nicholas Poon Guokun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Poon Guokun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nicholas Poon Guokun has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Breakpoint LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Este Villa MCST v TPS Construction: Limitation Act & Striking Out in Construction Defect Case(Jun 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nicholas Poon Guokun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nicholas Poon Guokun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Este Villa MCST v TPS Construction: Limitation Act & Striking Out in Construction Defect Case 09 Jun 2024 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4099 (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Jun 2024	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4099 (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the third defendant, KTP Consultants Pte Ltd, was dismissed due to being time-barred. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.