Niklas Wong See Keat

Niklas Wong See Keat is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and medical law. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wakaf Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inherent Powers of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Case Management Stay	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Revisionary Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Niklas Wong See Keat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Niklas Wong See Keat has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	5 cases	100% of cases	OOPA Pte Ltd v Bui Sy Phong: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Opportunity(Jun 2021) Lee Pheng Lip Ian v Chen Fun Gee: Judicial Review of SMC Disciplinary Proceedings(Feb 2020) Fauziyah bte Mohd Ahbidin v Singapore Land Authority: Striking Out Action Regarding Land Acquisition and Title Claim(Dec 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Niklas Wong See Keat's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Lost	24.3 parties avg	4.3	40%
Won	25.3 parties avg	5.3	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Niklas Wong See Keat's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	125,000.00	62,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	OOPA Pte Ltd v Bui Sy Phong: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Opportunity 15 Jun 2021 Bui Sy Phong (Defendant)Lost	15 Jun 2021	Bui Sy Phong (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe defendant's defense was rejected, and the court found him liable for breach of fiduciary duty. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lee Pheng Lip Ian v Chen Fun Gee: Judicial Review of SMC Disciplinary Proceedings 09 Feb 2020 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent, Defendant)Won	09 Feb 2020	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent, Defendant): Successful defense of appealAppeal dismissed; awarded costs fixed at $25,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Fauziyah bte Mohd Ahbidin v Singapore Land Authority: Striking Out Action Regarding Land Acquisition and Title Claim 17 Dec 2019 Fauziyah bte Mohd Ahbidin (executrix of the estate of Mohamed Ahbideen bin Mohamed Kassim (alias Ahna Mohamed Zainal Abidin bin Kassim), deceased) (Plaintiff)Dismissed	17 Dec 2019	Fauziyah bte Mohd Ahbidin (executrix of the estate of Mohamed Ahbideen bin Mohamed Kassim (alias Ahna Mohamed Zainal Abidin bin Kassim), deceased) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's action was struck out.
4	A Co v D: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration and Case Management Stay 19 Jun 2018 C Co (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Jun 2018	C Co (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication for stay of proceedings dismissed.
5	Rahimah Bte Mohd Salim v Public Prosecutor: Litigation Privilege & Disclosure of IMH Reports 10 Oct 2016 Rahimah Bte Mohd Salim (Petitioner)Won	10 Oct 2016	Rahimah Bte Mohd Salim (Petitioner): Appeal AllowedCriminal revision allowed. Disclosure Order set aside; retrial ordered before a different district judge.