Nirmal Singh

Nirmal Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and real estate. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nirmal Singh has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Housing Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nirmal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nirmal Singh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Raj Kumar & Rama	3 cases	75% of cases	TQN v TQO: Division of Matrimonial Home in Divorce Proceedings(Aug 2016) PP v Marzuki bin Ahmad: Corruption, Prevention of Corruption Act, Penalty for Accepting Gratification(Aug 2014) Edwin s/o Suse Nathen v PP: Drink Driving Offence & Appropriate Sentencing(Sep 2013)
S K Kumar Law Practice LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Poh Choon Kia v Lim Hoe Heng: Specific Performance of HDB Flat Sale(Apr 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nirmal Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nirmal Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,500.00	1,875.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TQN v TQO: Division of Matrimonial Home in Divorce Proceedings 03 Aug 2016 TQN (Plaintiff)Partial	03 Aug 2016	TQN (Plaintiff): Partial Division of Matrimonial HomeReceived 33% share of the Matrimonial Home. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	PP v Marzuki bin Ahmad: Corruption, Prevention of Corruption Act, Penalty for Accepting Gratification 26 Aug 2014 Marzuki bin Ahmad (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	26 Aug 2014	Marzuki bin Ahmad (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partThe Accused’s appeal to reduce the aggregate sentence of eight months’ imprisonment was dismissed, but his appeal against the District Judge’s decision to order a penalty of $25,000 under s 13(1) was allowed. That penalty order was substituted with an order that the Accused pay a penalty of $5,000 under s 13(1). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Edwin s/o Suse Nathen v PP: Drink Driving Offence & Appropriate Sentencing 29 Sep 2013 Edwin s/o Suse Nathen (Appellant)Partial	29 Sep 2013	Edwin s/o Suse Nathen (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; disqualification period reduced to 21 months and fine reduced to $2,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Poh Choon Kia v Lim Hoe Heng: Specific Performance of HDB Flat Sale 25 Apr 2012 Lim Hoe Heng's wife (Defendant)Lost	25 Apr 2012	Lim Hoe Heng's wife (Defendant): Order to withdraw caveatThe second defendant was ordered to withdraw her caveat within two weeks of the order. She is not permitted to lodge any further caveat in respect of the flat. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.