Niroze Idroos

Niroze Idroos is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Niroze Idroos has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Niroze Idroos has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Niroze Idroos has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Vijay & Co	2 cases	100% of cases	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Recovery of Dividends & Share Ownership Dispute(Mar 2015) M+W Singapore v Leow Tet Sin: Dishonest Assistance, Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Trading(Jan 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Niroze Idroos's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	22.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Niroze Idroos's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,696,827.02	5,348,413.512 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Recovery of Dividends & Share Ownership Dispute 11 Mar 2015 Ng Chee Weng (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	11 Mar 2015	Ng Chee Weng (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the timing of the share sale, entitling the appellant to dividends from 2003-2006. The court affirmed the trial judge's decision that a settlement agreement existed but was repudiated by the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	M+W Singapore v Leow Tet Sin: Dishonest Assistance, Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Trading 15 Jan 2015 Yukiyasu Nakagawa (Defendant)Lost	15 Jan 2015	Yukiyasu Nakagawa (Defendant): Claim upheld against DefendantThe court found the defendant liable for dishonest assistance in a breach of trust and inducing a breach of contract, and ordered him to pay $5,348,413.51 jointly and severally with the other defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).