Noel John Geno-Oehlers

Noel John Geno-Oehlers is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in employment law and international arbitration. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Morality	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Noel John Geno-Oehlers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Noel John Geno-Oehlers has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Characterist LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Swift Maids v Cheong: Contract Breach, Employee Duties, Fiduciary Duty(Nov 2023) WPA v WPB: Discovery Application Dispute Over YLL's Will and Testament(Aug 2023) Solvadis v Affert: Mareva Injunction & Risk of Asset Dissipation in Sulphur Export Contract Dispute(Oct 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Noel John Geno-Oehlers's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	26.3 parties avg	6.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Noel John Geno-Oehlers's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(25%)	25%
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	2,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Swift Maids v Cheong: Contract Breach, Employee Duties, Fiduciary Duty 01 Nov 2023 Swift Maids Resources Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	01 Nov 2023	Swift Maids Resources Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim Dismissed
2	WPA v WPB: Discovery Application Dispute Over YLL's Will and Testament 21 Aug 2023 WPA (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	21 Aug 2023	WPA (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against order dismissing the application for a summons for discovery was dismissed. Costs are to be paid by the plaintiff to the 2nd Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Solvadis v Affert: Mareva Injunction & Risk of Asset Dissipation in Sulphur Export Contract Dispute 22 Oct 2013 Solvadis Commodity Chemicals Gmbh (Plaintiff)Won	22 Oct 2013	Solvadis Commodity Chemicals Gmbh (Plaintiff): Application grantedPlaintiff was awarded costs of SGD 6,000. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.