Noh Hamid

Noh Hamid is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in writ of seizure and sale.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Noh Hamid has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and commercial law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Excessive Seizure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory Immunity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Auction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Noh Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Noh Hamid has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gurbani & Co.	1 cases	100% of cases	South East Enterprises v Hean Nerng: Duties Under Writ of Seizure and Sale(May 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Noh Hamid's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Noh Hamid's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	South East Enterprises v Hean Nerng: Duties Under Writ of Seizure and Sale 30 May 2012 SOUTH EAST ENTERPRISES (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Lost	30 May 2012	SOUTH EAST ENTERPRISES (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against both the first and second defendants is dismissed, and the plaintiff is ordered to bear the costs of the first and second defendants to be taxed on a standard basis if not agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.