Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim

Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of confidence and contract law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in employment law and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Employment Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
I.R.B Law LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	3D Networks Singapore Pte Ltd v Voon South Shiong: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty, and Conspiracy(Jul 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nur Izyan binte Mohammad Rahim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	3D Networks Singapore Pte Ltd v Voon South Shiong: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty, and Conspiracy 17 Jul 2022 Voon South Shiong (Defendant)Lost	17 Jul 2022	Voon South Shiong (Defendant): Liable for breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of confidence, and conspiracyDefendant found liable for breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of confidence, and conspiracy; damages to be assessed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).