Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor

Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and guarantee. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Selvam LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Eleven Gesellschaft v Boxsentry: Enforcement of Berlin Default Judgment for Breach of Contract(Oct 2014) Suhaidah bte Mohd Noor v Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff: Trust Document Handover Dispute(Jun 2014)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	IMC Transworld Pte Ltd v Ashapura Minechem Ltd: Summary Judgment for Guarantee Payment Obligations(Dec 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	15,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	IMC Transworld Pte Ltd v Ashapura Minechem Ltd: Summary Judgment for Guarantee Payment Obligations 25 Dec 2023 IMC Transworld Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	25 Dec 2023	IMC Transworld Pte Ltd (Claimant): Judgment for ClaimantSummary judgment on the merits be entered against the defendant. Costs were to be in the cause, with such costs awarded to the claimant on an indemnity basis under the terms of the Guarantee. I fixed the costs to the claimant at $30,000, excluding disbursements which would be on a reimbursement basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Eleven Gesellschaft v Boxsentry: Enforcement of Berlin Default Judgment for Breach of Contract 19 Oct 2014 Boxsentry Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	19 Oct 2014	Boxsentry Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeals dismissedBoxsentry's appeals against the dismissal of its stay application and the grant of summary judgment to Eleven were dismissed.
3	Suhaidah bte Mohd Noor v Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff: Trust Document Handover Dispute 24 Jun 2014 Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff (Defendant)Won	24 Jun 2014	Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff (Defendant): Application DismissedPlaintiffs' application dismissed. Costs awarded to the Defendant on a standard basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.