Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali

Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and trademarks. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Parallel Importation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Exhaustion of Rights	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ella Cheong LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Samsonite IP Holdings Sarl v An Sheng Trading Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement & Exhaustion of Rights(Feb 2017)
ATMD Bird & Bird LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Luo Faming: Culpable Homicide Sentencing(Nov 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nurul Asyikin Binte Mohamed Razali's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Samsonite IP Holdings Sarl v An Sheng Trading Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement & Exhaustion of Rights 05 Feb 2017 SAMSONITE IP HOLDINGS SARL (Plaintiff)Won	05 Feb 2017	SAMSONITE IP HOLDINGS SARL (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffSummary judgment granted to the Plaintiff, including an injunction, delivery up of goods, and an inquiry as to damages or account of profits (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Public Prosecutor v Luo Faming: Culpable Homicide Sentencing 01 Nov 2011 Luo Faming (Defendant)Lost	01 Nov 2011	Luo Faming (Defendant): Sentenced to ImprisonmentSentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment for culpable homicide and 6 years’ imprisonment for a second charge, to run consecutively, for a total of 24 years’ imprisonment.