Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne

Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and civil contempt. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Laches	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Titles Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Registration of Title	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Discovery Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kirpal & Associates	2 cases	50% of cases	Harun v Abdul Samad: Striking Out Claim, Limitation Act & Land Title Dispute(Oct 2017) Technigroup v Singh: Civil Contempt & Sentencing for Discovery Order Breach(Apr 2017)
Hu Shoulin	2 cases	50% of cases	Toyota Tsusho v Foo Tseh Wan: Contempt of Court for Failure to Disclose Assets(Feb 2017) Toyota Tsusho v UOB & Vintech: Pre-Action Discovery for Fraud Proceeds Tracing(Apr 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	35.4 parties avg	5.4	75%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	35.8 parties avg	5.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Oh Hsiu Leem Osborne's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	37,000.00	12,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Harun v Abdul Samad: Striking Out Claim, Limitation Act & Land Title Dispute 05 Oct 2017 Syed Abdulkader bin Syed Ali (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	05 Oct 2017	Syed Abdulkader bin Syed Ali (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; plaintiffs ordered to pay costs of SGD 16,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Technigroup v Singh: Civil Contempt & Sentencing for Discovery Order Breach 17 Apr 2017 Chaw Kooi Lin (Defendant)Lost	17 Apr 2017	Chaw Kooi Lin (Defendant): Found in contempt of courtFound in contempt of court and fined $5,000.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Toyota Tsusho v Foo Tseh Wan: Contempt of Court for Failure to Disclose Assets 09 Feb 2017 Vintech Engrg Pte. Ltd. (Defendant)Neutral	09 Feb 2017	Vintech Engrg Pte. Ltd. (Defendant): OtherThe judgment primarily concerns the committal application against Gan Teck Beng of Vintech Engrg Pte Ltd. The outcome for Vintech Engrg Pte. Ltd. is not explicitly stated in this extract.
4	Toyota Tsusho v UOB & Vintech: Pre-Action Discovery for Fraud Proceeds Tracing 18 Apr 2016 Vintech Engrg Pte. Ltd. (Defendant)Lost	18 Apr 2016	Vintech Engrg Pte. Ltd. (Defendant): Summons dismissedThe second defendant's application for a stay or strike-out of the originating summons was dismissed.