Ong Bock Kee
Ong Bock Kee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up.
Areas of Practice and Expertise
Ong Bock Kee has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and insolvency law.
Practice Area | Case Volume |
---|---|
Company Law | 2 cases |
Insolvency Law | 1 cases |
Winding Up | 1 cases |
Commercial Disputes | 1 cases |
Misrepresentation | 1 cases |
Fraud and Deceit | 1 cases |
Agency Law | 1 cases |
Contract Law | 1 cases |
Joint Venture Agreement | 1 cases |
Commission Agreement | 1 cases |
Breach of Contract | 1 cases |
General Management Consultancy Services | 1 cases |
Law Firm Affiliations
Ong Bock Kee has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Toh Tan & Partners | 1 cases |
G Raman & Partners | 1 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Ong Bock Kee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.7
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
Partial | 13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2001 | 12.0 parties avg |
2006 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Ong Bock Kee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(50%) |
Partial | 1(50%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2001 | 1 1 |
2006 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
Case |
---|
14 Jun 2006 Azlan Bin Abdul Rahim (Plaintiff, Creditor)Partial |
22 Mar 2001 China Women Industry Development Corporation (Plaintiff)Lost |