Ong Eu Jin

Ong Eu Jin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and passing off. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trademarks and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trademarks	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Patents	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trade Secrets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Distinctiveness	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inventions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ong Eu Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ong Eu Jin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Amica Law LLC	6 cases	100% of cases	TMRG Pte Ltd v Caerus Holding Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Dispute over 'Luke's' Restaurant Name(Feb 2022) TMRG Pte Ltd v Caerus Holding Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off & Invalidity of Luke's Lobster Trade Marks(Jul 2021) Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute(Jul 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ong Eu Jin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.1
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	46.0 parties avg	6.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	28.7 parties avg	8.7
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ong Eu Jin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,000.00	1,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TMRG Pte Ltd v Caerus Holding Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Dispute over 'Luke's' Restaurant Name 17 Feb 2022 Lukes Seafood LLC (Respondent, Defendant)Won	17 Feb 2022	Lukes Seafood LLC (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	TMRG Pte Ltd v Caerus Holding Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off & Invalidity of Luke's Lobster Trade Marks 12 Jul 2021 Lukes Seafood LLC (Defendant)Won	12 Jul 2021	Lukes Seafood LLC (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantPlaintiffs' claims for trade mark infringement, passing off, and invalidation of the Luke's Lobster trade marks are dismissed.
3	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute 21 Jul 2020 Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Jul 2020	Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPlaintiff was awarded costs of the action on a standard basis. Costs for the costs hearing were ordered in favor of the Plaintiff and fixed at $3,000, including disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: CVD Diamond Patents, Validity, and Infringement 06 Feb 2020 Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Feb 2020	Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partSG 872 found valid and infringed.
5	PCCW Media v M1 Ltd: Copyright Infringement & Site Blocking under Section 193DDA of the Copyright Act 23 Apr 2018 M1 Net Ltd (Defendant)Won	23 Apr 2018	M1 Net Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court ruled in favor of the defendant, M1 Net Ltd, as the plaintiff's application was dismissed.
6	Courts (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Big Box Corporation Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Invalidity & Distinctiveness 04 Apr 2018 COURTS (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (Appellant)Lost	04 Apr 2018	COURTS (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the decision of the learned IP Adjudicator in Courts (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Big Box Corporation Pte Ltd [2017] SGIPOS 5 dated 2 May 2017 refusing the appellant’s application for a declaration of invalidity of the registration of Trade Mark No T0501003C for the plain word mark, BIG BOX, owned by the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.