Ong Tai Tiong Desmond

Ong Tai Tiong Desmond is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and injunctions. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice21% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of unless order	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Proportionality	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ong Tai Tiong Desmond has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Solitaire LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	DNG FZE v PayPal Pte Ltd: Striking Out Pleadings for Breach of Unless Order(Mar 2024)
JLC Advisors LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Tang Ying v Chen Mingliang: Mareva Injunction, Misrepresentation & Fiduciary Duty(Oct 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ong Tai Tiong Desmond's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	110.0 parties avg	10.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ong Tai Tiong Desmond's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DNG FZE v PayPal Pte Ltd: Striking Out Pleadings for Breach of Unless Order 11 Mar 2024 D.N.G FZE (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	11 Mar 2024	D.N.G FZE (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to strike out the plaintiff's claim was dismissed. Costs of $5,000 in SUM 326 and $20,000 in RA 24 awarded to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Tang Ying v Chen Mingliang: Mareva Injunction, Misrepresentation & Fiduciary Duty 11 Oct 2018 Zhang Haibo (Plaintiff)Partial	11 Oct 2018	Zhang Haibo (Plaintiff): Injunction variedInjunction order granted against the Sound Property was lifted. In its place, the court granted the plaintiffs leave to lodge a caveat against the Sound Property.