Ong Xin Jie

Ong Xin Jie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	6 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Newton hearings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adduction of new evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mandatory Treatment Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mutual Legal Assistance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ong Xin Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ong Xin Jie has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	7 cases	100% of cases	How Soo Feng v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading under Companies Act(Sep 2023) PP v Kong Swee Eng: Corruption, Sentencing, and Adduction of New Evidence(Aug 2023) Geevanathan v Public Prosecutor: Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Code & Mandatory Treatment Orders for Drug Offences(Jun 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ong Xin Jie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	29%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	52.4 parties avg	2.4

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ong Xin Jie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Partial	2(29%)	29%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	5 122	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	How Soo Feng v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading under Companies Act 07 Sep 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	07 Sep 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed.
2	PP v Kong Swee Eng: Corruption, Sentencing, and Adduction of New Evidence 21 Aug 2023 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Partial	21 Aug 2023	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part with respect to all but two of the charges.
3	Geevanathan v Public Prosecutor: Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Code & Mandatory Treatment Orders for Drug Offences 15 Jun 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	15 Jun 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original sentence.
4	Iseli Rudolf James Maitland v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Motion to Amend Petition of Appeal 15 May 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	15 May 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application AllowedThe court allowed the applicant's criminal motion to rely on additional grounds of appeal.
5	Teo Chu Ha v Public Prosecutor: Corruption & CDSA Offences in Seagate Tender Case 08 May 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant, Applicant)Partial	08 May 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant, Applicant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against sentence partially allowed; sentences adjusted.
6	Raj Kumar v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust and Entrustment under Section 405 Penal Code 13 Sep 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Sep 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion dismissedThe criminal motion brought by the applicant was dismissed.
7	Raj Kumar v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust & Identity of Entrusting Party 14 Mar 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Mar 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed.