Ooi Huey Hien

Ooi Huey Hien is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 71% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice16% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accounting	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied authority of agent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency by estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Account of Profits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ooi Huey Hien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ooi Huey Hien has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	2 cases	29% of cases	Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Fiduciary Duties, Account on Wilful Default(Sep 2018) Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Res Judicata & Issue Estoppel in Accounting Phase(Sep 2018)
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	2 cases	29% of cases	Maryani Sadeli v Arjun Permanand Samtani: Equitable Compensation & Breach of Fiduciary Duties in Horizon Towers Collective Sale(Nov 2014) Maruti Shipping v Tay Sien Djim: Contempt of Court for Breaching Anton Piller & Mareva Injunctions(Nov 2014)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	2 cases	29% of cases	Eng Chiet Shoong v Cheong Soh Chin: Quantum Meruit & Implied Contracts Dispute(Jul 2016) JES International v Yang Shushan: Breach of Contract, Agency by Estoppel, Damages(Apr 2016)
LVM Law Chambers LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Re Dasin Retail Trust: Moratorium for Scheme of Arrangement under IRDA(Jan 2025)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ooi Huey Hien's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.4
Complex Cases: 5 (71%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	29.0 parties avg	9.0	29%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	14%
Won	45.3 parties avg	5.3	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2016	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2025	111.0 parties avg	11.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ooi Huey Hien's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,118,600.00	529,650.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Dasin Retail Trust: Moratorium for Scheme of Arrangement under IRDA 12 Jan 2025 Bounty Way Investments Limited (Other)Lost	12 Jan 2025	Bounty Way Investments Limited (Other): Objection DismissedObjection to the moratorium application was dismissed.
2	Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Fiduciary Duties, Account on Wilful Default 27 Sep 2018 Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff)Won	27 Sep 2018	Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedClaim allowed in part; the exact monetary amount will be determined after hearing parties on interest, costs, and the form of the judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Res Judicata & Issue Estoppel in Accounting Phase 27 Sep 2018 Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff)Won	27 Sep 2018	Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff): Judgment in favor of PlaintiffThe court held that the defendants are precluded from arguing that there was an overarching agreement for the plaintiffs to pay the costs and expenses incurred by the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Eng Chiet Shoong v Cheong Soh Chin: Quantum Meruit & Implied Contracts Dispute 12 Jul 2016 Wee Boo Tee (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	12 Jul 2016	Wee Boo Tee (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe Wees are obliged to pay management fees for the initial private equity funds until 8 July 2012 (assumed USD, as the initial agreement was in USD).
5	JES International v Yang Shushan: Breach of Contract, Agency by Estoppel, Damages 04 Apr 2016 JES International Holdings Limited (Plaintiff)Won	04 Apr 2016	JES International Holdings Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDamages assessed in the sum of $2,088,600 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Maryani Sadeli v Arjun Permanand Samtani: Equitable Compensation & Breach of Fiduciary Duties in Horizon Towers Collective Sale 19 Nov 2014 Maryani Sadeli (Appellant)Lost	19 Nov 2014	Maryani Sadeli (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $30,000 awarded to each respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Maruti Shipping v Tay Sien Djim: Contempt of Court for Breaching Anton Piller & Mareva Injunctions 06 Nov 2014 Maruti Shipping Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	06 Nov 2014	Maruti Shipping Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffContempt of court established against all contemnors; costs awarded to the plaintiff on an indemnity basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).