Ooi Oon Tat

Ooi Oon Tat is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 18 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in estate administration and civil practice. Their track record shows a 16.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 39% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated expertise across 62 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estate administration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor-client relationship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discharge of Counsel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tracing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offshore Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wealth Protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Release	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interests	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Certificate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Leasing Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction and Arrest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ownership of vessels	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ooi Oon Tat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ooi Oon Tat has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Salem Ibrahim & Partners	4 cases	22% of cases	Abundance Development v Absolut Events: Interpretation of 'Punggol Plaza Main Atrium' in Licence Agreement(Aug 2009) Vijayalakshmi v Mrinalini: Oppression Claim Under Companies Act(Aug 2009) Tri-M.G. Intra Asia Airlines v Norse Air Charter: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Clause Interpretation(Jan 2009)
Judy Cheng & Co	4 cases	22% of cases	Ding Auto v Yip Kin Lung: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Knowing Receipt(Oct 2019) Kuntjoro Wibawa v Harianty Wibawa: Breach of Trust, Offshore Trusts, and Inheritance Dispute(May 2016) Tommy Choo v Kuntjoro Wibawa: Taxation of Costs Dispute over Legal Fees and Oral Agreement(Sep 2015)
C Arul & Partners	4 cases	22% of cases	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Inquiry into Deceased's Estate Distribution(Jun 2003) Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Interim Payments, Mareva Injunctions & Third Party Proceedings in Estate Inquiry(Sep 2002) Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Application for Discharge of Counsel due to Conflict of Interest(Apr 2002)
Low Yeap Toh & Goon	2 cases	11% of cases	Summit Co v Pacific Biosciences: Winding Up Petition by Minority Shareholder(Oct 2006) Chan Mei Lan Kristine v Ong Boon Huat Samuel: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Women's Charter(Jun 2006)
C Arul and Partners	2 cases	11% of cases	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Appeal over Estate Valuation and Distribution(Jun 2004) In Re IVANOVO: Charterers' Claim for Breach of Charterparty and State of Ukraine's Ownership Dispute(Feb 2000)
Wong Alliance LLP	1 cases	6% of cases	Yang Dan v Xian De Lai: Work Injury Compensation & General Law Claim(Nov 2010)
Asia Ascent Law Corporation	1 cases	6% of cases	Ong Boon Huat Samuel v Chan Mei Lan Kristine: Appeal on Division of Matrimonial Assets(Aug 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ooi Oon Tat's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.4
Complex Cases: 7 (39%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	6%
Lost	126.1 parties avg	6.1	67%
Neutral	22.5 parties avg	2.5	11%
Unknown	15.0 parties avg	5.0	6%
Won	33.3 parties avg	3.3	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2003	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2006	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2009	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ooi Oon Tat's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	12(63%)	63%
Neutral	2(11%)	11%
Unknown	1(5%)	5%
Won	3(16%)	16%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	676,650.18	67,665.0210 cases	10

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Unknown: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 18 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ding Auto v Yip Kin Lung: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Knowing Receipt 10 Oct 2019 Chiun Tser Peng Andy (Defendant)Dismissed	10 Oct 2019	Chiun Tser Peng Andy (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against defendant dismissed.
2	Kuntjoro Wibawa v Harianty Wibawa: Breach of Trust, Offshore Trusts, and Inheritance Dispute 31 May 2016 Kuntjoro Wibawa @ Wong Kin Tjong (Plaintiff)Lost	31 May 2016	Kuntjoro Wibawa @ Wong Kin Tjong (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action against the first defendant is dismissed with costs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tommy Choo v Kuntjoro Wibawa: Taxation of Costs Dispute over Legal Fees and Oral Agreement 13 Sep 2015 Kuntjoro Wibawa @ Wong Kin Tjong (Respondent, Defendant)Won	13 Sep 2015	Kuntjoro Wibawa @ Wong Kin Tjong (Respondent, Defendant): Application AllowedMr. Wibawa’s application in SUM 3318 was allowed. The excess sum of $96,000 has to be returned to Mr Wibawa. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Tommy Choo v Kuntjoro Wibawa: Appeal Against Stay of Taxation of Costs 16 Apr 2014 Kuntjoro Wibawa (Respondent)Lost	16 Apr 2014	Kuntjoro Wibawa (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Bill of Costs No 173 of 2013 be restored for taxation. Costs of this appeal to be costs to the applicant, to be fixed before me should parties fail to agree. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Yang Dan v Xian De Lai: Work Injury Compensation & General Law Claim 24 Nov 2010 Xian De Lai Shanghai Cuisine Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	24 Nov 2010	Xian De Lai Shanghai Cuisine Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe defendant's appeal was allowed, preventing the plaintiff from pursuing a general law claim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Abundance Development v Absolut Events: Interpretation of 'Punggol Plaza Main Atrium' in Licence Agreement 31 Aug 2009 Absolut Events & Marketing Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	31 Aug 2009	Absolut Events & Marketing Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
7	Vijayalakshmi v Mrinalini: Oppression Claim Under Companies Act 12 Aug 2009 Vijayalakshmi Sivaprakasapillai (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	12 Aug 2009	Vijayalakshmi Sivaprakasapillai (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, restoring the plaintiff's claim. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Tri-M.G. Intra Asia Airlines v Norse Air Charter: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Clause Interpretation 11 Jan 2009 P. T. Tri-M.G. Intra Asia Airlines (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Jan 2009	P. T. Tri-M.G. Intra Asia Airlines (Plaintiff): Application for stay of proceedings allowedThe court allowed the defendant's application to stay the proceedings in favour of arbitration.
9	Asian Corporate Services v Impact Pacific: Taxation of Costs Dispute After Settlement Agreement 20 Oct 2008 Mark Justin Baile (Defendant)Lost	20 Oct 2008	Mark Justin Baile (Defendant): Costs to be paidCosts of the claim and counterclaim in Suit 834/2004 to be taxed and paid forthwith. Costs of the originating summons fixed at $5,000 to be paid by the first to eighth defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Summit Co v Pacific Biosciences: Winding Up Petition by Minority Shareholder 18 Oct 2006 Summit Co (S) Pte Ltd (Petitioner)Lost	18 Oct 2006	Summit Co (S) Pte Ltd (Petitioner): Petition dismissedWinding up petition dismissed.
11	Ong Boon Huat Samuel v Chan Mei Lan Kristine: Appeal on Division of Matrimonial Assets 07 Aug 2006 Ong Boon Huat Samuel (Appellant)Neutral	07 Aug 2006	Ong Boon Huat Samuel (Appellant): Application for extension of time became academicHusband's application for an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal became academic as leave to appeal was not required.
12	Chan Mei Lan Kristine v Ong Boon Huat Samuel: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Women's Charter 15 Jun 2006 Ong Boon Huat Samuel (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	15 Jun 2006	Ong Boon Huat Samuel (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissed with slight variation to the judge’s order.Husband to pay the wife 15% of the net total value of both properties at 259 Onan Road and 373 Onan Road #01-10 Malvern Springs, which amounted to $18,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Appeal over Estate Valuation and Distribution 15 Jun 2004 Husni Sjamsudin also known as Ong Siauw-Tjoan (Defendant)Lost	15 Jun 2004	Husni Sjamsudin also known as Ong Siauw-Tjoan (Defendant): Appeal dismissedSecond defendant’s appeal was concerned almost entirely with findings of fact and was dismissed.
14	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Inquiry into Deceased's Estate Distribution 12 Jun 2003 Ong Siauw Ping (Defendant)	12 Jun 2003	Ong Siauw Ping (Defendant): -
15	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Interim Payments, Mareva Injunctions & Third Party Proceedings in Estate Inquiry 26 Sep 2002 Second defendant (Defendant)Lost	26 Sep 2002	Second defendant (Defendant): Application for interim payment disallowedSecond defendant's application as a beneficiary was disallowed.
16	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Application for Discharge of Counsel due to Conflict of Interest 22 Apr 2002 Ong Siauw Tjoan (Defendant)Neutral	22 Apr 2002	Ong Siauw Tjoan (Defendant): NeutralThe outcome for the second defendant is neutral in this application for discharge of counsel.
17	In Re IVANOVO: Charterers' Claim for Breach of Charterparty and State of Ukraine's Ownership Dispute 14 Feb 2000 Plaintiffs (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Feb 2000	Plaintiffs (Plaintiff): Writ set asideThe plaintiffs' writ was set aside.
18	Ivanovo: Admiralty Jurisdiction, Vessel Ownership, and the Evidentiary Value of Ship Registration Certificates 14 Feb 2000 Plaintiffs (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Feb 2000	Plaintiffs (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' claim for breach of charterparty was dismissed as the action was found to be ultra vires.