Os Agarwal

Os Agarwal is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in res judicata and non-delegable duties. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 63% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Os Agarwal has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Non-delegable duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Independent contractors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ultra-hazardous activities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Expert Determination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Os Agarwal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Os Agarwal has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Thomas & Leong	6 cases	75% of cases	Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties(Nov 2017) Ng Huat Seng v Munib Mohammad Madni: Vicarious Liability & Non-Delegable Duty for Demolition Damage(Sep 2017) Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan: Abuse of Process, Contract Variation, and Oral Agreement Dispute(Aug 2017)
Holborn Law LLC	2 cases	25% of cases	Lim Siew Fern v Tan Beng Yong: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Dispute(Nov 2023) Powercom Yuraku v Sunpower Semiconductor: Setting Aside Default Judgment in Singapore High Court(Aug 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Os Agarwal's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 5 (63%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.8 parties avg	2.8	50%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	13%
Won	45.3 parties avg	5.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2017	34.8 parties avg	4.8
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Os Agarwal's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(44%)	44%
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Won	4(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	5,000.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2017	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Siew Fern v Tan Beng Yong: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Dispute 16 Nov 2023 Agile Accomm Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	16 Nov 2023	Agile Accomm Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application Opposed SuccessfullySuccessfully opposed the plaintiff's application, with costs of $10,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Powercom Yuraku v Sunpower Semiconductor: Setting Aside Default Judgment in Singapore High Court 31 Aug 2022 Vijaykumar Kishinchand Amesur (Defendant)Neutral	31 Aug 2022	Vijaykumar Kishinchand Amesur (Defendant): No specific outcomeNo specific outcome was mentioned for the fourth defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	Tan Eck Hong v Maxz Universal: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties 30 Nov 2017 Tan Eck Hong (Plaintiff)Won	30 Nov 2017	Tan Eck Hong (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court found evidence of oppressive conduct and ordered a share buyout.
4	Ng Huat Seng v Munib Mohammad Madni: Vicarious Liability & Non-Delegable Duty for Demolition Damage 25 Sep 2017 Zahrah Ayub (Respondent)Won	25 Sep 2017	Zahrah Ayub (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondents; awarded costs of $35,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan: Abuse of Process, Contract Variation, and Oral Agreement Dispute 13 Aug 2017 Lim Geok Lin Andy (Appellant)Lost	13 Aug 2017	Lim Geok Lin Andy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Respondent.
6	Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan: Costs, Offer to Settle 24 Nov 2016 Lim Geok Lin Andy (Plaintiff)Lost	24 Nov 2016	Lim Geok Lin Andy (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan: Profit Sharing Dispute & Oral Agreement Variation 20 Oct 2016 Lim Geok Lin Andy (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Oct 2016	Lim Geok Lin Andy (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for a 25% share of profits was dismissed with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Ng Huat Seng v Munib Mohammad Madni: Vicarious Liability & Non-Delegable Duty for Demolition Damage 21 Jun 2016 Zahrah Ayub (Respondent, Defendant)Won	21 Jun 2016	Zahrah Ayub (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal fixed at $10,000 as well as reasonable disbursements.