Osborne Oh

Osborne Oh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in joinder of parties and civil practice. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Osborne Oh has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trust law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trust Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Joinder of Parties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trustees	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Osborne Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Osborne Oh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kirpal & Associates	2 cases	100% of cases	Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff v Harun bin Syed Hussain Aljunied: Intervention in Trust Will Dispute(Apr 2017) Alsagoff v Aljunied: Leasehold Interests, Fraud, Conspiracy & Intermeddling(Nov 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Osborne Oh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 12.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	112.0 parties avg	12.0	50%
Won	112.0 parties avg	12.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	112.0 parties avg	12.0
2017	112.0 parties avg	12.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Osborne Oh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	24,000.00	24,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff v Harun bin Syed Hussain Aljunied: Intervention in Trust Will Dispute 16 Apr 2017 Syed Abdulkader Bin Syed Ali @ Syed Abdul Kader Alhadad (Respondent)Won	16 Apr 2017	Syed Abdulkader Bin Syed Ali @ Syed Abdul Kader Alhadad (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of $12,000 awarded to the first and second respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Alsagoff v Aljunied: Leasehold Interests, Fraud, Conspiracy & Intermeddling 08 Nov 2016 Syed Abdulkader Bin Syed Ali @ Syed Abdul Kader Alhadad (Defendant)Dismissed	08 Nov 2016	Syed Abdulkader Bin Syed Ali @ Syed Abdul Kader Alhadad (Defendant): Claim dismissedPlaintiffs' claims in fraud, conspiracy and intermeddling were dismissed.