Osman Khan

Osman Khan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and torts.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Osman Khan has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Osman Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Osman Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Osman Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Osman Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Osman Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Osman Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Osman Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Osman Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Osman Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Osman Khan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Greenway Environmental v Cramoil: Negligence, Breach of Duty, and Fire Explosion Liability(Aug 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Osman Khan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Osman Khan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	579,641.50	579,641.501 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Greenway Environmental v Cramoil: Negligence, Breach of Duty, and Fire Explosion Liability 29 Aug 2021 Cramoil Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Aug 2021	Cramoil Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be paid in the amount of $579,641.50 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).