P Sivakumar

P Sivakumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in intellectual property law and patents. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

P Sivakumar has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in intellectual property law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Intellectual Property Law	3 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Patents	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Copyright Infringement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Patent Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat of infringement proceedings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality Breach	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	P Sivakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

P Sivakumar has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ella Cheong & G Mirandah	2 cases	67% of cases	Merck v Pharmaforte: Lovastatin Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute(Jul 2000) Radcoflex v James Lim: Copyright Infringement & Breach of Contract Dispute(May 2000)
P Sivakumar and Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Trek Technology v FE Global: Patent Infringement, Validity & Misrepresentation(May 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of P Sivakumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.7 parties avg	3.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of P Sivakumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Trek Technology v FE Global: Patent Infringement, Validity & Misrepresentation 11 May 2005 M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	11 May 2005	M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Claims dismissedClaims against M-Systems dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Merck v Pharmaforte: Lovastatin Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute 27 Jul 2000 Merck & Co., Inc (Appellant)Lost	27 Jul 2000	Merck & Co., Inc (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the decision of the High Court was dismissed.
3	Radcoflex v James Lim: Copyright Infringement & Breach of Contract Dispute 26 May 2000 Radcoflex Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 May 2000	Radcoflex Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of contract was dismissed due to a lack of evidence.