P Soman

P Soman is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and work injury compensation.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

P Soman has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in negligence and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Negligence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	P Soman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	P Soman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	P Soman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	P Soman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	P Soman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	P Soman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	P Soman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	P Soman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Malingering	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	P Soman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

P Soman has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
S K Kumar and Associates	1 cases	100% of cases	Rajendran v Drill-Quip: Assessment of Damages for Work Injury and Loss of Earning Capacity(May 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of P Soman's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of P Soman's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,000.00	6,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rajendran v Drill-Quip: Assessment of Damages for Work Injury and Loss of Earning Capacity 13 May 2004 Rajendran a/l Palany (Appellant)Partial	13 May 2004	Rajendran a/l Palany (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part; $6,000 awarded for future medication (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).