Palakrishnan

Palakrishnan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2000. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and criminal law. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Palakrishnan has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Palakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Palakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Palakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Palakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Palakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Palakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Palakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Palakrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Palakrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Palakrishnan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	50% of cases	PP v Abdul Salam: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Common Intention(Sep 2000)
Palakrishnan & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Loganatha Venkatesan v PP: Conspiracy to Commit Murder & Admissibility of Police Statements(Aug 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Palakrishnan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Palakrishnan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Abdul Salam: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Common Intention 06 Sep 2000 Wong Kok Loong (Defendant)Lost	06 Sep 2000	Wong Kok Loong (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted on an amended charge of delivery of 165.67 grams of diamorphine to Suboh.
2	Loganatha Venkatesan v PP: Conspiracy to Commit Murder & Admissibility of Police Statements 14 Aug 2000 Julaiha Begum (Appellant)Lost	14 Aug 2000	Julaiha Begum (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction for abetting murder by conspiracy was dismissed.