Pancharatnam Jeya Putra

Pancharatnam Jeya Putra is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and jurisdiction. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Pancharatnam Jeya Putra has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
AsiaLegal LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	The Working Capitol (Robinson) Pte Ltd v Capitol Concepts Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application for Inability to Pay Debts(Oct 2018) Tarkus Interiors v The Working Capitol: Winding Up Application Based on Inability to Pay Debts(Apr 2018) Jiangsu Overseas Group v. Concord Energy: Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Lack of Jurisdiction in Green Petroleum Coke Contracts(Aug 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pancharatnam Jeya Putra's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pancharatnam Jeya Putra's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	The Working Capitol (Robinson) Pte Ltd v Capitol Concepts Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application for Inability to Pay Debts 03 Oct 2018 The Working Capitol (Robinson) Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	03 Oct 2018	The Working Capitol (Robinson) Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Winding up order grantedWinding up order granted against the Defendant. Costs of the winding up proceedings are to be taxed, if not agreed or fixed, and paid to the Plaintiff out of the assets of the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tarkus Interiors v The Working Capitol: Winding Up Application Based on Inability to Pay Debts 29 Apr 2018 Tarkus Interiors Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Apr 2018	Tarkus Interiors Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffApplication granted. Costs were ordered to be taxed if not agreed, and to be paid to the plaintiff out of the assets of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Jiangsu Overseas Group v. Concord Energy: Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Lack of Jurisdiction in Green Petroleum Coke Contracts 09 Aug 2016 Concord Energy Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	09 Aug 2016	Concord Energy Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissed with costsThe plaintiff's application to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed; Concord Energy was awarded costs of $10,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).