Pang Hui Min

Pang Hui Min is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Pang Hui Min has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Further and better particulars	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Guarantees	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pang Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Pang Hui Min has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	3 cases	75% of cases	Arovin Ltd v Hadiran Sridjaja: Document Production, Relevance, and Legal Privilege(Sep 2019) Arovin Ltd v Hadiran Sridjaja: Dispute over Pleadings and Requests for Further and Better Particulars(Nov 2018) Swiber Holdings Ltd v Swiber Offshore Construction: Judicial Management & Secured Creditors(Aug 2018)
Tan Kok Quan Partnership LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	BLL v BLM: Issue Estoppel & Res Judicata in Mental Capacity Case(Sep 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pang Hui Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	25.5 parties avg	5.5	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	24.7 parties avg	4.7
2019	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pang Hui Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,000.00	3,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Arovin Ltd v Hadiran Sridjaja: Document Production, Relevance, and Legal Privilege 09 Sep 2019 Vijay Goradia (Plaintiff)Partial	09 Sep 2019	Vijay Goradia (Plaintiff): PartialThe court ordered production of documents relating to the sharing of liabilities arising out of any guarantee and/or exit option demanded by EDBI in respect of the Initial PCOA, but declined to order production in respect of Request 11 and Request 12. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	BLL v BLM: Issue Estoppel & Res Judicata in Mental Capacity Case 09 Sep 2019 BLL (Plaintiff)Neutral	09 Sep 2019	BLL (Plaintiff): Allowed relitigation of undue influence issueThe court allowed the defendants to relitigate the issue of undue influence.
3	Arovin Ltd v Hadiran Sridjaja: Dispute over Pleadings and Requests for Further and Better Particulars 11 Nov 2018 Vijay Goradia (Plaintiff)Won	11 Nov 2018	Vijay Goradia (Plaintiff): Application grantedThe defendant shall pay the plaintiffs’ costs of the application, assessed at S$3,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Swiber Holdings Ltd v Swiber Offshore Construction: Judicial Management & Secured Creditors 15 Aug 2018 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Other)Neutral	15 Aug 2018	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Other): NeutralUOB submitted a proof of debt to the Judicial Managers based on the corporate guarantees executed by SHL.