Pang Khin Wee

Pang Khin Wee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and work injury compensation. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pang Khin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Pang Khin Wee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hoh Law Corporation	6 cases	100% of cases	Sompo Insurance v Tay Jia Yi: Work Injury Compensation for Cardiac Arrest(May 2022) Urs Eller v Cheong Kiat Wah: Trust Breach, Share Dilution, Equitable Compensation(Nov 2021) Eller v Cheong: Breach of Trust & Share Issuance Dispute in Medical Device Distribution(May 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pang Khin Wee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.8 parties avg	3.8	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pang Khin Wee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
MYR	3,032,233.25	3,032,233.251 cases	1
SGD	482,282.69	241,141.352 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sompo Insurance v Tay Jia Yi: Work Injury Compensation for Cardiac Arrest 22 May 2022 Tay Jia Chen (Respondent, Applicant)Lost	22 May 2022	Tay Jia Chen (Respondent, Applicant): Appeal DismissedThe respondent's appeal was dismissed.
2	Urs Eller v Cheong Kiat Wah: Trust Breach, Share Dilution, Equitable Compensation 09 Nov 2021 Cheong Kiat Wah (Defendant)Lost	09 Nov 2021	Cheong Kiat Wah (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantDefendant ordered to pay equitable compensation in the amount of RM 3,032,233.25 (assumed MYR, as the company is Malaysian).
3	Eller v Cheong: Breach of Trust & Share Issuance Dispute in Medical Device Distribution 20 May 2020 Cheong Kiat Wah (Defendant)Lost	20 May 2020	Cheong Kiat Wah (Defendant): Liability foundLiability found for breaching Clause 3.3 read with Clause 3.4(b) of the Trust Deed. An assessment of compensatory relief is to be conducted by the Registrar to determine the amount of compensatory relief, if any, which is to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd v Biswas Dipu: Work Injury Compensation - Principal's Liability 13 Oct 2019 Biswas Dipu (Respondent)Won	13 Oct 2019	Biswas Dipu (Respondent): Order upheldThe order for Bintai Kindenko Private Limited to compensate Biswas Dipu for $21,174.89 was upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Yap Boon Fong Yvonne v Wong Kok Mun Alvin: Damages Assessment for Road Accident & Loss of Earnings 25 Nov 2018 Yap Boon Fong Yvonne (Ye Wenfeng Yvonne) (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	25 Nov 2018	Yap Boon Fong Yvonne (Ye Wenfeng Yvonne) (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAwarded $166,370 in damages for pre-trial loss of earnings, plus interest. Awarded $80,000 in damages for post-trial loss of earning capacity. The final judgment sum for Ms Yap is $461,107.80. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	UOY v UOZ: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife's Maintenance After 31-Year Marriage 29 Oct 2018 UOZ (Defendant)Won	29 Oct 2018	UOZ (Defendant): Orders made in his favorThe Husband was ordered to receive the wife's interest in the matrimonial flat upon paying her $40,360. The Husband was also not required to pay maintenance to the Wife.