Pang Ru Xue Jamie

Pang Ru Xue Jamie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in statutory interpretation and protection from online falsehoods and manipulation act 2019. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Pang Ru Xue Jamie has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in constitutional law and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Constitutional Law	3 cases	20% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue Jamie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	20% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue Jamie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue Jamie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue Jamie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue Jamie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act 2019	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue Jamie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue Jamie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA)	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue Jamie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue Jamie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Pang Ru Xue Jamie has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA Appeal & Correction Direction(Jul 2022) Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression(Feb 2022) The Online Citizen Pte Ltd v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods(Feb 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pang Ru Xue Jamie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pang Ru Xue Jamie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,000.00	6,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA Appeal & Correction Direction 24 Jul 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	24 Jul 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Costs awardedCosts of $6,000 awarded to the Attorney-General, to be paid by the Singapore Democratic Party. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression 27 Feb 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent, Defendant)Won	27 Feb 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Section 377A deemed unenforceable unless Attorney-General signals change in prosecutorial policy.
3	The Online Citizen Pte Ltd v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods 18 Feb 2020 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	18 Feb 2020	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Attorney-General successfully defended the Part 3 Correction Direction issued to The Online Citizen Pte Ltd.