Pao Pei Yu Peggy

Pao Pei Yu Peggy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and moneylenders act. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Pao Pei Yu Peggy has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	23% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pao Pei Yu Peggy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 23% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pao Pei Yu Peggy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pao Pei Yu Peggy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pao Pei Yu Peggy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pao Pei Yu Peggy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pao Pei Yu Peggy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pao Pei Yu Peggy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pao Pei Yu Peggy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Loansharking	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pao Pei Yu Peggy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pao Pei Yu Peggy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Pao Pei Yu Peggy has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Mohammad Ashik v PP: Statutory Interpretation of Misuse of Drugs Act & Admissibility of Evidence(Sep 2011) Public Prosecutor v Nelson Jeyaraj: Enhanced Sentence for Harassment by Fire under Moneylenders Act(Feb 2011) Tan Chin Hock v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Dismissed in Drug Trafficking Case(Dec 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pao Pei Yu Peggy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pao Pei Yu Peggy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohammad Ashik v PP: Statutory Interpretation of Misuse of Drugs Act & Admissibility of Evidence 06 Sep 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Sep 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, upholding the appellant's conviction.
2	Public Prosecutor v Nelson Jeyaraj: Enhanced Sentence for Harassment by Fire under Moneylenders Act 15 Feb 2011 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	15 Feb 2011	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal to enhance the sentence was allowed.
3	Tan Chin Hock v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Dismissed in Drug Trafficking Case 15 Dec 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	15 Dec 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe conviction of the appellant for drug trafficking was upheld.