Parveen Kaur

Parveen Kaur is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and admiralty and maritime law. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Parveen Kaur has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial sale of vessel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Action in rem	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Parveen Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Parveen Kaur has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	DP Shipbuilding v Owner of LONG BRIGHT: Judicial Sale of Vessel & Plaintiff's Right to Release(Oct 2018) United Overseas Bank v Owner of Swiber Concorde: Forfeited Deposit as Proceeds of Sale(Sep 2018)
Madhavan Partnership	1 cases	20% of cases	Teo Beng Ngoh v Quek Kheng Leong Nicky: Dispute over Property Sale and Purchase Agreement(Dec 2008)
Sant Singh Partnership	1 cases	20% of cases	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Duress, Undue Influence & Deed of Settlement Dispute(Jun 2006)
Azman Soh & Murugaiyan	1 cases	20% of cases	Legend Building Supplies v Chon Hwa Construction: Breach of Contract for Steel Rebars(Oct 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Parveen Kaur's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	60%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2018	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Parveen Kaur's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	676,008.23	338,004.122 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DP Shipbuilding v Owner of LONG BRIGHT: Judicial Sale of Vessel & Plaintiff's Right to Release 02 Oct 2018 Hangzhou Chuantao Investment Management Partnership (Limited Partnership) (1st Intervener)Neutral	02 Oct 2018	Hangzhou Chuantao Investment Management Partnership (Limited Partnership) (1st Intervener): Supported discharge of sale orderSupported the discharge of the existing sale order so that the Vessel could be re-advertised for sale after it was re-arrested in the 1st intervener’s own in rem action against the Vessel.
2	United Overseas Bank v Owner of Swiber Concorde: Forfeited Deposit as Proceeds of Sale 06 Sep 2018 United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff)Won	06 Sep 2018	United Overseas Bank Limited (Plaintiff): Order that forfeited deposit be treated as part of proceeds of saleThe court ordered that the deposit forfeited in the present case by the Sheriff from the earlier abortive sale of the Vessel to VML should be treated as part of the proceeds of sale of the Vessel. As there were no other claimants before the court other than the Plaintiff, and as the judgment sum exceeded the aggregate of the said proceeds of sale and the forfeited deposit, I ordered that the forfeited deposit be paid out to the Plaintiff in the same manner as the said proceeds of sale. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Teo Beng Ngoh v Quek Kheng Leong Nicky: Dispute over Property Sale and Purchase Agreement 08 Dec 2008 Lee Pheng (Defendant)Lost	08 Dec 2008	Lee Pheng (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim for specific performance dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Lal Hiranand v Kamla Lal Hiranand: Duress, Undue Influence & Deed of Settlement Dispute 05 Jun 2006 Lal Hiranand (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Jun 2006	Lal Hiranand (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim that the 1999 deed be set aside or declared unenforceable was dismissed.
5	Legend Building Supplies v Chon Hwa Construction: Breach of Contract for Steel Rebars 29 Oct 2000 Chon Hwa Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Oct 2000	Chon Hwa Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; ordered to pay $626,008.23 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).