Patrick Chin

Patrick Chin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal revision and trademarks. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Patrick Chin has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Customs Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trade names	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Patrick Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Patrick Chin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chin Patrick & Co	4 cases	80% of cases	PP v Ong Gim Hoo: Criminal Revision for Customs Act Offences & Amendment of Prior Convictions(Apr 2014) Mohamed Ali v Tan Ah Bee: Specific Performance of Option to Purchase for Property(Dec 2009) Jurong Port v Huationg: Indemnity Clauses & Negligence Liability(Jun 2009)
Chin Patrick Dennis Loh & Co	1 cases	20% of cases	Kian Wah Hung v William Interior Design: Extension of Time for Appeal in Sale of Goods Dispute(Nov 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Patrick Chin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Patrick Chin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,000.00	1,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2014	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Ong Gim Hoo: Criminal Revision for Customs Act Offences & Amendment of Prior Convictions 03 Apr 2014 Ong Gim Hoo (Respondent)Neutral	03 Apr 2014	Ong Gim Hoo (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application to amend the respondent's previous convictions was dismissed.
2	Mohamed Ali v Tan Ah Bee: Specific Performance of Option to Purchase for Property 08 Dec 2009 Tan Ah Bee (Defendant)Lost	08 Dec 2009	Tan Ah Bee (Defendant): Specific performance orderedThe court ordered specific performance of the Option in particular as follows: (1) That the Plaintiff pay S$13,000 to the Defendant and (2) That the Defendant (i) executes all necessary documents and to take all necessary action to effectively transfer the Property to the Plaintiff, failing which the Registrar of the Supreme Court, be empowered to do so. (ii) pays the Plaintiff interest for late completion in accordance with The Singapore Law Society’s Conditions of Sale 1999. (iii) pays the Plaintiff, in damages the sum of S$2,500 per month being the rental from 11 September 2009 (the original date of completion) to actual date of completion pursuant to this Order. (iv) pays the Plaintiff’s costs and disbursements, with such costs and disbursements to be agreed or taxed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Jurong Port v Huationg: Indemnity Clauses & Negligence Liability 25 Jun 2009 Huationg Inland Transport Service Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	25 Jun 2009	Huationg Inland Transport Service Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Huationg was not required to indemnify Jurong Port. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Chai Chyau Ling v Racing Technology: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off 03 May 2009 Racing Technology Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	03 May 2009	Racing Technology Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $4,000 inclusive of disbursements, to be paid to the Respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Kian Wah Hung v William Interior Design: Extension of Time for Appeal in Sale of Goods Dispute 04 Nov 2001 Kian Wah Hung (Private) Limited (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	04 Nov 2001	Kian Wah Hung (Private) Limited (Appellant, Defendant): Application dismissed with costsApplication for extension of time to file Record of Appeal and Appellant’s Case out of time was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.