Patrick Tan Tse Chia

Patrick Tan Tse Chia is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restraining Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Parenting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equitable Accounting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interim Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Child Abduction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Hague Convention	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychology	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Import Drugs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Patrick Tan Tse Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Patrick Tan Tse Chia has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Fortis Law Corporation	1 cases	25% of cases	Pereira v Mascreenos: Property Ownership Dispute & Equitable Accounting(May 2018)
Patrick Tan LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	BDU v BDT: Hague Convention, International Child Abduction, Grave Risk of Psychological Harm(Feb 2014)
Patrick Tan & Associates	1 cases	25% of cases	Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi v PP: Conspiracy & Importation of Controlled Drugs under Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2006)
Patrick Tan and Associates	1 cases	25% of cases	PP v Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi: Importing Diamorphine & Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Patrick Tan Tse Chia's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Patrick Tan Tse Chia's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	69,726.50	69,726.501 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Pereira v Mascreenos: Property Ownership Dispute & Equitable Accounting 14 May 2018 Jarret Pereira (Plaintiff)Partial	14 May 2018	Jarret Pereira (Plaintiff): Entitled to $69,726.50 by way of equitable accountingPlaintiff is entitled to $69,726.50 by way of equitable accounting (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	BDU v BDT: Hague Convention, International Child Abduction, Grave Risk of Psychological Harm 16 Feb 2014 BDT (Respondent)Won	16 Feb 2014	BDT (Respondent): Application AllowedApplication for the return of the child to Germany allowed, subject to specific undertakings.
3	Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi v PP: Conspiracy & Importation of Controlled Drugs under Misuse of Drugs Act 15 Mar 2006 Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi (Appellant)Lost	15 Mar 2006	Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction for importing controlled drugs dismissed.
4	PP v Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi: Importing Diamorphine & Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Dec 2005 Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi (Defendant)Lost	21 Dec 2005	Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi (Defendant): GuiltyFound guilty of importing controlled drugs.