Paul

Paul is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Paul has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reckless Driving	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Paul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Paul has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Cross Street Chambers	2 cases	29% of cases	Agustinus Hadi v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving under Road Traffic Act(Oct 2024) Amarjeet Singh v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Motion, Plea Agreements & Court Jurisdiction(Mar 2021)
East Asia Law Corporation	1 cases	14% of cases	ARX v ARY: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings(Feb 2015)
Murthy & Co	1 cases	14% of cases	Chan Siak Huat v Public Prosecutor: Driving Without a Valid License and Driving Without Due Care and Attention(Apr 2012)
Sim & Wong LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Public Prosecutor v UI: Sentencing for Rape of a Minor by Father; Mitigating Factors of Forgiveness(Aug 2007)
Paul Tan and Partners	1 cases	14% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Katun Bee Bte S Ibrahim: Culpable Homicide under Section 304(b) of the Penal Code(Mar 2004)
Paul, Tan & Harbans	1 cases	14% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ridwan: Sentencing for Grievous Hurt with Dangerous Weapons under Penal Code(Mar 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Paul's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.8 parties avg	2.8	71%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Withdrawn	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Paul's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Withdrawn	1(14%)	14%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Withdrawn: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Agustinus Hadi v Public Prosecutor: Dangerous Driving under Road Traffic Act 15 Oct 2024 Agustinus Hadi (Appellant)Lost	15 Oct 2024	Agustinus Hadi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence of seven months' imprisonment and a 36-month driving ban was dismissed.
2	Amarjeet Singh v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Motion, Plea Agreements & Court Jurisdiction 29 Mar 2021 Amarjeet Singh (Applicant)Withdrawn	29 Mar 2021	Amarjeet Singh (Applicant): Application WithdrawnThe applicant withdrew the criminal motion after the court raised concerns about its jurisdictional basis.
3	ARX v ARY: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings 26 Feb 2015 ARY (Defendant)Partial	26 Feb 2015	ARY (Defendant): PartialAppealed against part of the maintenance order. The court ordered that the parties try to distribute the matrimonial assets as of 30 June 2012 in such a manner that the defendant receives 50% of the asset pool valued at $1,476,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Chan Siak Huat v Public Prosecutor: Driving Without a Valid License and Driving Without Due Care and Attention 10 Apr 2012 Chan Siak Huat (Appellant)Lost	10 Apr 2012	Chan Siak Huat (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against sentence for driving offences was dismissed.
5	Public Prosecutor v UI: Sentencing for Rape of a Minor by Father; Mitigating Factors of Forgiveness 27 Aug 2007 UI (Defendant)Lost	27 Aug 2007	UI (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedThe accused was convicted of rape and sentenced to 16 years imprisonment.
6	Public Prosecutor v Katun Bee Bte S Ibrahim: Culpable Homicide under Section 304(b) of the Penal Code 01 Mar 2004 Katun Bee Bte S Ibrahim (Defendant)Lost	01 Mar 2004	Katun Bee Bte S Ibrahim (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted of culpable homicide and sentenced to three years and six months’ imprisonment.
7	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ridwan: Sentencing for Grievous Hurt with Dangerous Weapons under Penal Code 04 Mar 2003 Norizan Bin Tahir (Defendant)Lost	04 Mar 2003	Norizan Bin Tahir (Defendant): Sentence of imprisonment and caningSentenced to eight years’ imprisonment and eight strokes of the cane.