Paul Aman Singh Sambhi

Paul Aman Singh Sambhi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and consumer law. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Consumer Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penalty Clauses	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unfair Trading Practices	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adduction of Further Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Paul Aman Singh Sambhi has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	4 cases	67% of cases	VeriFone v Firemane: Appeal Dismissed, Summary Judgment Affirmed, Settlement Agreement Dispute(Oct 2024) DFI v DFJ: Application to Set Aside Arbitral Award Dismissed; Costs Awarded to DFJ(May 2024) DFI v DFJ: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Alleged Breach of Natural Justice(Jan 2024)
KSCGP Juris LLP	2 cases	33% of cases	Nail Palace v Competition and Consumer Commission: Unfair Practices & Consumer Protection(Jul 2023) Nail Palace v Competition and Consumer Commission: Appeal on Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act(Apr 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Paul Aman Singh Sambhi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.8 parties avg	3.8	83%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	34.3 parties avg	4.3
2024	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Paul Aman Singh Sambhi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83%)	83%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	141,516.36	47,172.123 cases	3
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	VeriFone v Firemane: Appeal Dismissed, Summary Judgment Affirmed, Settlement Agreement Dispute 20 Oct 2024 VeriFone, Inc (Claimant, Respondent)Won	20 Oct 2024	VeriFone, Inc (Claimant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, summary judgment affirmed. No additional monetary amount specified for this party. Assumed USD as the original claim was in USD.
2	DFI v DFJ: Application to Set Aside Arbitral Award Dismissed; Costs Awarded to DFJ 02 May 2024 DFI (Claimant)Lost	02 May 2024	DFI (Claimant): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed, and DFI was ordered to pay DFJ's costs of $131,516.36 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	DFI v DFJ: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Alleged Breach of Natural Justice 31 Jan 2024 DFI (Claimant)Lost	31 Jan 2024	DFI (Claimant): Application dismissedThe claimant's application to set aside the partial award was dismissed.
4	Beltran v Terraform Labs: Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration Agreements & Online Contracts 29 Nov 2023 Luna Foundation Guard Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Nov 2023	Luna Foundation Guard Ltd (Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
5	Nail Palace v Competition and Consumer Commission: Unfair Practices & Consumer Protection 27 Jul 2023 Nail Palace (SM) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	27 Jul 2023	Nail Palace (SM) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the Publication Order and the Consumer Notification and Consent Order dismissed. The appellants are to comply with the terms of the District Judge’s Consumer Notification and Consent Order and Publication Order for two years, except that the starting date of these orders is to run from the date of this decision. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Nail Palace v Competition and Consumer Commission: Appeal on Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act 25 Apr 2023 Nail Palace (SM) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	25 Apr 2023	Nail Palace (SM) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to amend the Notice of Appeal was dismissed; costs of $5,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).