Paul Fitzgerald

Paul Fitzgerald is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in copyrights.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Paul Fitzgerald has demonstrated expertise across 6 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Fitzgerald has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Fitzgerald has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Fitzgerald has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Fitzgerald has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Fitzgerald has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Fitzgerald has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Paul Fitzgerald has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Stamford Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Lee Cheong Ngan v PP: Building Act Violation & Plea Validity(May 2004)
Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee	1 cases	50% of cases	Performing Right Society v United Artists: Copyright Infringement of Musical Works in Films(Mar 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Paul Fitzgerald's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Paul Fitzgerald's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Cheong Ngan v PP: Building Act Violation & Plea Validity 04 May 2004 Chiong Yen Bao (Applicant)Lost	04 May 2004	Chiong Yen Bao (Applicant): Criminal revision dismissedApplication to set aside conviction was rejected.
2	Performing Right Society v United Artists: Copyright Infringement of Musical Works in Films 21 Mar 2001 United Artists Singapore Theatres Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	21 Mar 2001	United Artists Singapore Theatres Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim partially successfulThe plaintiffs' claim succeeded in respect of the Jerry Maguire Works but not in respect of the Titanic Works. United Artists are accountable to the plaintiffs for the public performance of the Jerry Maguire Works. The court ordered that United Artists pay two-thirds of the costs of the plaintiffs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.