Paul Ong

Paul Ong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and banking and finance. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Paul Ong has demonstrated expertise across 50 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	8 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	8 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Margin Call	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Algorithmic Trading	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Currency Exchange Platform	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Derivatives	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wealth Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Banking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Exchange	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
FX Trading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-Competition Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Computers and Software	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Paul Ong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	9 cases	75% of cases	B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract, Breach of Trust, and Equitable Compensation(May 2019) Thio Syn Pyn v Thio Syn Kym Wendy: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation(Mar 2019) B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract, Mistake, and Breach of Trust in Cryptocurrency Exchange(Mar 2019)
Allen & Gledhill	3 cases	25% of cases	B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Security for Costs Application in Cryptocurrency Trading Dispute(Jul 2018) B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Discovery, Confidentiality & Expert Witness in Algorithmic Trading Dispute(Mar 2018) B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Summary Judgment Refused in Breach of Contract & Trust Claim(Dec 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Paul Ong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 2 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Partial	24.5 parties avg	4.5	17%
Won	42.6 parties avg	2.6	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	33.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Paul Ong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(50%)	50%
Partial	2(17%)	17%
Won	4(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,961.65	851.667 cases	7
USD	2,270,478.86	756,826.293 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract, Breach of Trust, and Equitable Compensation 13 May 2019 Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	13 May 2019	Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant): Liable for breach of contract and breach of trustDefendant found liable for breach of contract and breach of trust; the amount of damages or equitable compensation to be assessed at a further hearing (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Thio Syn Pyn v Thio Syn Kym Wendy: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 26 Mar 2019 Thio Syn Wee (Appellant)Lost	26 Mar 2019	Thio Syn Wee (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $28,000 (all-in) were to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract, Mistake, and Breach of Trust in Cryptocurrency Exchange 13 Mar 2019 Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	13 Mar 2019	Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant): LostJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be assessed at a later hearing. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Security for Costs Application in Cryptocurrency Trading Dispute 17 Jul 2018 Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	17 Jul 2018	Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendant's application for security for costs was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Discovery, Confidentiality & Expert Witness in Algorithmic Trading Dispute 19 Mar 2018 Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	19 Mar 2018	Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application for production of documents granted in partDefendant's application for production of documents was granted in part, with limited discovery ordered. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Summary Judgment Refused in Breach of Contract & Trust Claim 26 Dec 2017 Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	26 Dec 2017	Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant): Summary Judgment DeniedDefendant successfully opposed the Plaintiff's application for summary judgment.
7	ARS v ART: Tortious Interference, Breach of Contract, and Conspiracy in CCTV Supply Dispute 07 Apr 2015 ART (Defendant)Won	07 Apr 2015	ART (Defendant): Claims dismissedThe claims against the defendant were dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank AG: Promissory Estoppel & FX Contract Closure 03 Sep 2012 Deutsche Bank AG (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	03 Sep 2012	Deutsche Bank AG (Defendant, Respondent): Cross-appeal dismissedDefendant's cross-appeal against the assessment of damages was dismissed.
9	Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank AG: Breach of Contract & Promissory Estoppel in FX Trading 30 Nov 2010 Deutsche Bank AG (Respondent)Lost	30 Nov 2010	Deutsche Bank AG (Respondent): Judgment for Defendant reversedThe judgment for the respondent for the sum of US$1,135,239.43 for its counterclaim against the appellant for payment of his outstanding liabilities with interest and costs was reversed.
10	Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank: Wrongful FX Closure & Margin Calls 09 Feb 2010 Deutsche Bank AG (Defendant)Won	09 Feb 2010	Deutsche Bank AG (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaim in the sum of USD 1,135,239.43 is allowed together with interest and costs.
11	Lim Chee Twang v Chan Shuk Kuen Helina: Oppression, Corporate Veil & Minority Shareholder Rights in iPreciation Art Group 17 Dec 2009 Chan Shuk Kuen Helina (Defendant)Partial	17 Dec 2009	Chan Shuk Kuen Helina (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant in partJudgment for the First Defendant, Ms. Chan, in part; ordered to buy out Plaintiff's shares in Fine Arts, Contemporary, BVI Ltd, and HK Ltd.
12	Hengxin Technology v Jiang Wei: Breach of Contract & Non-Compete Dispute 18 Nov 2009 Qian Lirong (Defendant)Won	18 Nov 2009	Qian Lirong (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on CounterclaimJudgment for Qian Lirong on his counterclaim for unpaid bonuses and damages for repudiation of the service agreement. The monetary amount is the sum of $1,260.28, RMB1,101,900.49 and RMB378,574.36, converted to SGD at the prevailing exchange rate at the time of judgment. The judgment also allows the Company to setoff and deduct the actual withholding tax paid to the tax authorities on his behalf.