Paul Seah Zhen Wei

Paul Seah Zhen Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and civil practice. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Solicitor and Client Privilege	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
False Imprisonment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Casino Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Seah Zhen Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Paul Seah Zhen Wei has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	5 cases	100% of cases	Arbiters Inc Law Corp v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph: Taxation of Legal Fees in Negligence Suit(Jan 2024) Hi-P International Ltd v Tan Chai Hau: Interim Injunction for Breach of Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Clauses(Jun 2020) Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World: Costs Allocation After Partially Successful Claim for Negligence, Assault, and Wrongful Imprisonment(Mar 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Paul Seah Zhen Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Partial	26.0 parties avg	6.0	40%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Paul Seah Zhen Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,000.00	2,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Arbiters Inc Law Corp v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph: Taxation of Legal Fees in Negligence Suit 30 Jan 2024 Tan Kin Tee (Respondent)Won	30 Jan 2024	Tan Kin Tee (Respondent): Costs awardedThe applicant is to pay the plaintiffs a sum of $2,000 each (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Hi-P International Ltd v Tan Chai Hau: Interim Injunction for Breach of Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Clauses 23 Jun 2020 Tan Ping Eng (Defendant)Partial	23 Jun 2020	Tan Ping Eng (Defendant): Interim Injunction Granted in PartThe court granted an interim injunction against the third defendant, restraining him from using or revealing specific trade secrets and confidential information.
3	Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World: Costs Allocation After Partially Successful Claim for Negligence, Assault, and Wrongful Imprisonment 08 Mar 2017 SATS SECURITY SERVICES PTE LTD (Third Party)Neutral	08 Mar 2017	SATS SECURITY SERVICES PTE LTD (Third Party): NeutralNo orders were made against SATS because Mr Goel did not sue it. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
4	Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World: False Imprisonment, Assault & Battery in Casino 03 Nov 2015 SATS SECURITY SERVICES PTE LTD (Third Party)Dismissed	03 Nov 2015	SATS SECURITY SERVICES PTE LTD (Third Party): Third party claim dismissedThe third party claim between the Casino and SATS is redundant because the Casino is only liable in these proceedings for the acts of its own employees and not the APOs, there is no basis for the Casino to claim an indemnity or contribution from SATS for any damages I may order against it.
5	Kon Yin Tong v Leow Boon Cher: Liquidators' Claim for Fraudulent Transactions 13 Oct 2011 Kon Yin Tong (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Oct 2011	Kon Yin Tong (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the Plaintiff in part against certain defendants.