Paul Tan Beng Hwee

Paul Tan Beng Hwee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in international arbitration and arbitration. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and international arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Public Policy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
State Immunity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Indian Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Paul Tan Beng Hwee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Paul Tan Beng Hwee has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	Giant Light Metal v Aksa Far East: Enforcing Foreign Judgments in Singapore(Jan 2014) Over & Over Ltd v Bonvests Holdings: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Rights Issue Dispute(Feb 2010)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Van Zyl v Kingdom of Lesotho: Enforcement of Arbitral Award Against a State(May 2017)
Cavenagh Law LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	CHY & CHZ v CIA: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Conflict with Public Policy(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Paul Tan Beng Hwee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	42.8 parties avg	2.8	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Paul Tan Beng Hwee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CHY & CHZ v CIA: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Conflict with Public Policy 10 Feb 2022 CIA (Defendant)Won	10 Feb 2022	CIA (Defendant): Application to strike out evidence allowedThe defendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's expert evidence was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Van Zyl v Kingdom of Lesotho: Enforcement of Arbitral Award Against a State 07 May 2017 Kingdom of Lesotho (Defendant)Won	07 May 2017	Kingdom of Lesotho (Defendant): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; service of order must comply with State Immunity Act.
3	Giant Light Metal v Aksa Far East: Enforcing Foreign Judgments in Singapore 27 Jan 2014 Giant Light Metal Technology (Kunshan) Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jan 2014	Giant Light Metal Technology (Kunshan) Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; The Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff the PRC Judgment Sums as ordered in the PRC Judgment, reimburse the PRC Court Fees ordered under the PRC Judgment, and pay interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Over & Over Ltd v Bonvests Holdings: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Rights Issue Dispute 23 Feb 2010 Over & Over Ltd (Appellant)Won	23 Feb 2010	Over & Over Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; O&O permitted to realize the value of its shares at a fair value. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.