PE Ashokan

PE Ashokan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and personal injury. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

PE Ashokan has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Incentive Compensation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Industrial Accident	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	PE Ashokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

PE Ashokan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Khattar Wong & Partners	2 cases	67% of cases	Vadivel Ramesh v Aegis Equipment: Industrial Accident & Workmen's Compensation Act(Jan 2003) Hon Chi Wan Colman v PP: Criminal Breach of Trust & Entrustment of Dominion(Aug 2002)
KhattarWong LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Corinna Chin v Hewlett-Packard: Incentive Compensation Dispute over NETS Contract(Aug 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of PE Ashokan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of PE Ashokan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	627,369.54	627,369.541 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Corinna Chin v Hewlett-Packard: Incentive Compensation Dispute over NETS Contract 03 Aug 2015 CORINNA CHIN SHU HWA (Plaintiff)Won	03 Aug 2015	CORINNA CHIN SHU HWA (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; awarded $627,369.54 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Vadivel Ramesh v Aegis Equipment: Industrial Accident & Workmen's Compensation Act 13 Jan 2003 Seletar Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	13 Jan 2003	Seletar Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Claim Struck OutClaim against the second defendant was struck out.
3	Hon Chi Wan Colman v PP: Criminal Breach of Trust & Entrustment of Dominion 25 Aug 2002 Hon Chi Wan Colman (Appellant)Lost	25 Aug 2002	Hon Chi Wan Colman (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed.