Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu

Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and criminal law. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	PP v Parthiban Kanapathy: Drug Importation, Chain of Custody, Statement Accuracy(Sep 2019) Neo Ah Luan v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Dermal Filler Injections & Medical Registration Act Violation(Sep 2018) Chan Siak Huat v Public Prosecutor: Driving Without a Valid License and Driving Without Due Care and Attention(Apr 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Peggy Pao-Keerthi Pei Yu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Parthiban Kanapathy: Drug Importation, Chain of Custody, Statement Accuracy 23 Sep 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	23 Sep 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of importing diamorphine.
2	Neo Ah Luan v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Dermal Filler Injections & Medical Registration Act Violation 02 Sep 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	02 Sep 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulAppeal partially successful; sentence reduced but conviction upheld (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Chan Siak Huat v Public Prosecutor: Driving Without a Valid License and Driving Without Due Care and Attention 10 Apr 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Apr 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment upheldThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld as the appeal was dismissed.