Penny Leng

Penny Leng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and trademark infringement. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Penny Leng has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trademarks and commercial law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trademarks	4 cases	29% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Penny Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 29% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Penny Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Penny Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Penny Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Trade names	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Penny Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Interim Injunction	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Penny Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Penny Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Penny Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Penny Leng has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	50% of cases	Future Enterprises v McDonald's: Likelihood of Confusion Between 'MacCoffee' and 'McCAFÉ' Trademarks(Sep 2006) Da Vinci Collection v Richemont: Trade Mark Infringement & Interim Injunction(Jun 2006)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	McDonald's Corp v Future Enterprises: Trade Mark Registration Dispute(Nov 2004)
Drew and Napier	1 cases	25% of cases	McDonald's v Future Enterprises: Trade Mark Registration & Likelihood of Confusion(Apr 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Penny Leng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Penny Leng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	3,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Future Enterprises v McDonald's: Likelihood of Confusion Between 'MacCoffee' and 'McCAFÉ' Trademarks 28 Sep 2006 McDonald's Corp (Respondent)Won	28 Sep 2006	McDonald's Corp (Respondent): Opposition allowedOpposition to the registration of the MacCoffee mark was allowed; costs of $10,000 awarded against the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Da Vinci Collection v Richemont: Trade Mark Infringement & Interim Injunction 21 Jun 2006 Richemont International SA (Respondent)Lost	21 Jun 2006	Richemont International SA (Respondent): Interim Injunction Set AsideInterim injunction set aside (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	McDonald's Corp v Future Enterprises: Trade Mark Registration Dispute 02 Nov 2004 McDonald's Corp (Appellant)Lost	02 Nov 2004	McDonald's Corp (Appellant): Appeal DismissedMcDonald's appeal against the registration of Future Enterprises' trade marks was dismissed.
4	McDonald's v Future Enterprises: Trade Mark Registration & Likelihood of Confusion 25 Apr 2004 McDonald's Corp (Opponent, Appellant)Lost	25 Apr 2004	McDonald's Corp (Opponent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe originating motions were dismissed with costs to the applicants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.