Perera Randall Mingyang

Perera Randall Mingyang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in strata title law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Perera Randall Mingyang has demonstrated expertise across 6 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Perera Randall Mingyang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Perera Randall Mingyang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Perera Randall Mingyang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Perera Randall Mingyang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Building Management	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Perera Randall Mingyang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Perera Randall Mingyang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Perera Randall Mingyang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Colin Ng & Partners LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Sit Kwong Lam v Management Corporation: Strata Title, Common Property Dispute(Mar 2018) Sit Kwong Lam v MCST Plan No 2645: Strata Titles, Common Property, By-Laws Dispute(Mar 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Perera Randall Mingyang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Perera Randall Mingyang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	40,000.00	20,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sit Kwong Lam v Management Corporation: Strata Title, Common Property Dispute 04 Mar 2018 MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 2645 (Respondent)Won	04 Mar 2018	MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 2645 (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and costs of the appeal awarded to the Respondent fixed at $40,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Sit Kwong Lam v MCST Plan No 2645: Strata Titles, Common Property, By-Laws Dispute 26 Mar 2017 MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 2645 (Respondent)Won	26 Mar 2017	MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 2645 (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication dismissed with costs to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.