Periowsamy Otharam

Periowsamy Otharam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and criminal law. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misuse of drugs act and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Alternative Pleadings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Rule	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Periowsamy Otharam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Periowsamy Otharam has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Punithan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Evidence Discrepancies(Oct 2022) Punithan a/l Genasan v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Penal Code(Dec 2021)
Vijay & Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Amendment of Statement of Claim & Alternative Pleading(Nov 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Periowsamy Otharam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Periowsamy Otharam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Punithan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Evidence Discrepancies 30 Oct 2022 Punithan a/l Genasan (Appellant)Won	30 Oct 2022	Punithan a/l Genasan (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and appellant acquitted.
2	Punithan a/l Genasan v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Penal Code 12 Dec 2021 Punithan a/l Genasan (Appellant)Neutral	12 Dec 2021	Punithan a/l Genasan (Appellant): Original finding remains unaffectedOriginal finding that the Alleged Introductory Meeting took place on 12 October 2011 remains unaffected.
3	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Amendment of Statement of Claim & Alternative Pleading 17 Nov 2011 Ng Chee Weng (Appellant)Won	17 Nov 2011	Ng Chee Weng (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the respondent to pay half of the appellant's costs of the present appeal. There will be no order as to costs with regard to the proceedings before the Judge and the AR. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.