Peter Gabriel

Peter Gabriel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 21 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bills of lading and costs. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 24% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Peter Gabriel has demonstrated expertise across 109 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	17 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Remedies	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letters of Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ostensible Authority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Actual Authority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Riddick Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside arbitral awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Privity of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Existence of arbitration agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fund Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Benefit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Authority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholding Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment of Contractual Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral Variation of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tortious Interference	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Good Faith	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforceability of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cheque Truncation System	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Title to Sue	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Discharge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pledge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Peter Gabriel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Peter Gabriel has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 15 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gabriel Law Corporation	15 cases	71% of cases	Tecnomar v SBM Offshore: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Material Non-Disclosure(Nov 2020) Gabriel Law Corp v H&C S Holdings: Taxation of Costs in Arbitration Enforcement(Nov 2020) H&C S Holdings v Gabriel Law: Legal Profession, Remuneration & Bill of Costs(Jul 2018)
Gabriel Peter & Partners	5 cases	24% of cases	BNP Paribas v Bandung Shipping: Wrongful Cargo Discharge & Letters of Indemnity(May 2003) Sincere Watch v Bakery Mart: Dispute over Unfinalized Restructuring Agreement and Loan Repayments(Mar 2003) Abdul Razak Valibhoy v Keppel Investment Management Ltd: Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Investment Management(Oct 2002)
Gabriel Peter & Pnrs	1 cases	5% of cases	Wong Kok Keong v CBN Holdings: Trust, Share Transfer, and Validity of Share Allotment Dispute(Jun 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Peter Gabriel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 5 (24%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	142.9 parties avg	2.9	67%
Partial	34.0 parties avg	4.0	14%
Withdrawn	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Peter Gabriel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	14(67%)	67%
Partial	3(14%)	14%
Withdrawn	1(5%)	5%
Won	3(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	580,121.54	38,674.7715 cases	15
USD	611,764.03	611,764.031 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 21 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tecnomar v SBM Offshore: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Material Non-Disclosure 10 Nov 2020 Tecnomar & Associates Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	10 Nov 2020	Tecnomar & Associates Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Gabriel Law Corp v H&C S Holdings: Taxation of Costs in Arbitration Enforcement 05 Nov 2020 Gabriel Law Corporation (Applicant)Lost	05 Nov 2020	Gabriel Law Corporation (Applicant): Review application dismissedLaw Firm's review application dismissed.
3	H&C S Holdings v Gabriel Law: Legal Profession, Remuneration & Bill of Costs 25 Jul 2018 GABRIEL LAW COPORATION (Defendant)Partial	25 Jul 2018	GABRIEL LAW COPORATION (Defendant): Partial LossOrdered to pay the costs of the application to the Plaintiff. Leave granted to have Invoice 39 and Invoice 86 taxed.
4	BNX v BOE: Admission of Further Evidence on Appeal and Implied Undertaking 25 Jun 2018 BNX (Applicant, Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	25 Jun 2018	BNX (Applicant, Plaintiff, Appellant): Application DismissedBNX's applications in SUM 132 and SUM 133 to adduce further evidence on appeal were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	BNX v BOE: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Breach of Contract 20 Nov 2017 BNX (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	20 Nov 2017	BNX (Plaintiff, Applicant): Setting aside application dismissed; Action struck outPlaintiff's application to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed. The plaintiff's action was struck out. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Asia-American Investments Group Inc v UBS AG: Breach of Contract & Warranty of Authority 14 Jun 2017 Asia-American Investments Group Inc. (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Jun 2017	Asia-American Investments Group Inc. (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claims against the defendants were dismissed.
7	H&C S Holdings v Mount Eastern: Interim Measures & Dissipation of Assets in Arbitration 20 Dec 2015 H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	20 Dec 2015	H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for interim measures dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Teleoptik-Ziroskopi v Westacre Investments: Garnishee Orders and Beneficial Ownership of Funds 30 Jan 2012 Deuteron (Asia) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	30 Jan 2012	Deuteron (Asia) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed to the extent that the garnishee orders absolute were set aside.
9	Tjong Very Sumito v Chan Sing En: Security for Costs & Ordinary Residence 14 Aug 2011 Tjong Very Sumito (Appellant)Lost	14 Aug 2011	Tjong Very Sumito (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The court upheld the order for security for costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Bing Integrated v Eco Special Waste: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy Claims 24 Oct 2010 Eco Resource Recovery Centre Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	24 Oct 2010	Eco Resource Recovery Centre Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claims DismissedClaims against the 1st Third Party for breach of fiduciary duties and conspiracy were dismissed.
11	Bing Integrated Construction v Eco Special Waste Management: Construction Payment Dispute 29 Jun 2010 Eco Resource Recovery Centre Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Jun 2010	Eco Resource Recovery Centre Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the 2nd third party, Chua Tiong Guan. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	TCL Industries v ICC Chemical: Discovery of Documents and Counsel's Duty to Court 18 Dec 2008 ICC Chemical Corp (Defendant, Respondent)Won	18 Dec 2008	ICC Chemical Corp (Defendant, Respondent): Order for further discovery upheldOrder for further discovery upheld; costs awarded to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	TCL Industries v ICC Chemical: Discovery Dispute in Breach of Contract Claim 04 Dec 2007 ICC Chemical Corp (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	04 Dec 2007	ICC Chemical Corp (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $3,500 together with reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Sunny Daisy Ltd v WBG Network: Summary Judgment Appeal on Debt for Goods Sold 25 Jul 2006 WBG Network (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	25 Jul 2006	WBG Network (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed and judgment granted to the plaintiff in the sum of US$611,764.03 and interest at 6% per annum from the date of issue of the writ till date of judgment.
15	City Hardware v Goh Boon Chye: Cheque Truncation System & Negotiable Instruments 30 Jan 2005 City Hardware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jan 2005	City Hardware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for the plaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $576,621.54 with interest accruing at the rate of 6% per annum from 8 March 2004 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	BNP Paribas v Bandung Shipping: Wrongful Cargo Discharge & Letters of Indemnity 11 May 2003 BNP Paribas (Plaintiff)Won	11 May 2003	BNP Paribas (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for BNP Paribas with costs and damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Sincere Watch v Bakery Mart: Dispute over Unfinalized Restructuring Agreement and Loan Repayments 05 Mar 2003 Bakery Mart Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	05 Mar 2003	Bakery Mart Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Conditional leave to defend grantedConditional leave to defend granted to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Abdul Razak Valibhoy v Keppel Investment Management Ltd: Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Investment Management 10 Oct 2002 Abdul Razak Valibhoy (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Oct 2002	Abdul Razak Valibhoy (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action is dismissed with costs.
19	Adani Wilmar v Rabobank: Dispute over Rapeseed Oil Sale & Enforceability of Contract 14 Jun 2002 Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA ("Rabobank Nederland") (Defendant)Withdrawn	14 Jun 2002	Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA ("Rabobank Nederland") (Defendant): Counterclaim WithdrawnThe counterclaim was withdrawn in the course of the trial subject to the bank paying costs in the counterclaim up to the time of withdrawal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Arubugam Suppiah v Curt Evert Borgensten: Mareva Injunction & Breach of Contract Dispute 24 Jul 2001 Curt Evert Borgensten (Defendant)Lost	24 Jul 2001	Curt Evert Borgensten (Defendant): Application to set aside Mareva Injunction dismissedBorgensten's application to set aside the Mareva Injunction Order was dismissed.
21	Wong Kok Keong v CBN Holdings: Trust, Share Transfer, and Validity of Share Allotment Dispute 21 Jun 2001 Wong Kok Keong alias Wong Kock Khiang (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Jun 2001	Wong Kok Keong alias Wong Kock Khiang (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedWong's claims were dismissed, and he was ordered to pay costs on an indemnity basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).