Peter Ong

Peter Ong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Peter Ong has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Peter Ong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Peter Ong has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Thomas Loh Partnership	3 cases	60% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Anthony Ler & Z: Abetment to Murder & Murder under Penal Code(Dec 2001) Public Prosecutor v Yeo Kang Oh: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Aug 2001) Public Prosecutor v Tan Tiew Guay & Chow Mun Fai: Drug Trafficking & Possession(Nov 2000)
Templars Law LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	PP v Suhaimi Bin Said: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2017)
Peter Ong & Raymond Tan	1 cases	20% of cases	PP v Sufian bin Nordin: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly, and Penal Code Interpretation(Mar 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Peter Ong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.6 parties avg	3.6	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2001	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Peter Ong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Suhaimi Bin Said: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Apr 2017 Suhaimi Bin Said (Defendant)Lost	24 Apr 2017	Suhaimi Bin Said (Defendant): ConvictionAccused convicted on the charge and sentenced to death.
2	PP v Sufian bin Nordin: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly, and Penal Code Interpretation 09 Mar 2010 Muhammad Haziq Bin Mohamed (Defendant)Lost	09 Mar 2010	Muhammad Haziq Bin Mohamed (Defendant): Imprisonment and CaningSentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment and ten strokes of the cane.
3	Public Prosecutor v Anthony Ler & Z: Abetment to Murder & Murder under Penal Code 04 Dec 2001 Z (Defendant)Lost	04 Dec 2001	Z (Defendant): Guilty of MurderFound guilty of murder and sentenced to be detained during the President's pleasure due to his age.
4	Public Prosecutor v Yeo Kang Oh: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Aug 2001 Yeo Kang Oh (Defendant)Lost	27 Aug 2001	Yeo Kang Oh (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
5	Public Prosecutor v Tan Tiew Guay & Chow Mun Fai: Drug Trafficking & Possession 28 Nov 2000 Tan Tiew Guay (Defendant)Lost	28 Nov 2000	Tan Tiew Guay (Defendant): Guilty of PossessionFound guilty of possession of 5.29g of heroin and sentenced to 8 months imprisonment.