Philip Jeyaratnam

Philip Jeyaratnam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in mental capacity law and unjust enrichment. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Philip Jeyaratnam has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and trusts and estates.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Jeyaratnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Jeyaratnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Philip Jeyaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Jeyaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Jeyaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Jeyaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Philip Jeyaratnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Jeyaratnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Implied contracts	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Philip Jeyaratnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Philip Jeyaratnam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Eng Chiet Shoong v Cheong Soh Chin: Quantum Meruit & Implied Contracts Dispute(Jul 2016) Wong Sau Kuen v Wong Kai Wah: Dispute over Committee Appointment under Mental Disorders and Treatment Act(Jan 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Philip Jeyaratnam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.6
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	26.6 parties avg	6.6	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2016	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Philip Jeyaratnam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Eng Chiet Shoong v Cheong Soh Chin: Quantum Meruit & Implied Contracts Dispute 12 Jul 2016 Wee Boo Tee (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	12 Jul 2016	Wee Boo Tee (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe Wees are obliged to pay management fees for the initial private equity funds until 8 July 2012 (assumed USD, as the initial agreement was in USD).
2	Wong Sau Kuen v Wong Kai Wah: Dispute over Committee Appointment under Mental Disorders and Treatment Act 08 Jan 2008 Wong Suan Fong (Plaintiff)Partial	08 Jan 2008	Wong Suan Fong (Plaintiff): Application granted in partApplication granted in part; the 2nd to 5th Plaintiffs and the 2nd Defendant be made members of the Committee with parties at liberty to apply should circumstances change in the future. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.