Philip Jeyaretnam SC

Philip Jeyaretnam SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and winding up. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Network Leasing Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Philip Jeyaretnam SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Philip Jeyaretnam SC has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson	3 cases	60% of cases	Lau Yu Man v Wellmix Organics: Winding Up Order for Failure to Comply with Companies Act(Dec 2007) Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd: Extension of Time for Filing Affidavits(Jul 2007) Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd: Extension of Time for Filing Reply Affidavits(Jul 2007)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	BNX v BOE: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Breach of Contract(Nov 2017)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	PT Perusahaan Gas Negara v CRW Joint Operation: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Exceeding Mandate(Jul 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Philip Jeyaretnam SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Philip Jeyaretnam SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BNX v BOE: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Breach of Contract 20 Nov 2017 BOE (Defendant, Respondent)Won	20 Nov 2017	BOE (Defendant, Respondent): Setting aside application dismissed; Striking out application allowedDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's action was allowed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	PT Perusahaan Gas Negara v CRW Joint Operation: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Exceeding Mandate 19 Jul 2010 PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK (Applicant)Won	19 Jul 2010	PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK (Applicant): Application allowedApplication to set aside the Majority Award was allowed with the costs of the proceedings to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Lau Yu Man v Wellmix Organics: Winding Up Order for Failure to Comply with Companies Act 27 Dec 2007 Wellmix Organics (International) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Dec 2007	Wellmix Organics (International) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding Up OrderThe company was ordered to be wound up under s 254(1)(c) of the Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed).
4	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd: Extension of Time for Filing Affidavits 19 Jul 2007 Starhub Cable Vision Ltd (formerly known as Singapore Cable Vision Ltd) (Defendant)Won	19 Jul 2007	Starhub Cable Vision Ltd (formerly known as Singapore Cable Vision Ltd) (Defendant): Orders made for filing affidavits and seeking input from IDAThe court made orders for the plaintiff to file affidavits and for both parties to seek input from the Info-communications Development Authority of Singapore (IDA).
5	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd: Extension of Time for Filing Reply Affidavits 19 Jul 2007 Starhub Cable Vision Ltd (formerly known as Singapore Cable Vision Ltd) (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	19 Jul 2007	Starhub Cable Vision Ltd (formerly known as Singapore Cable Vision Ltd) (Defendant, Respondent): Application partially deniedThe defendant's position was partially upheld as the plaintiff's application for extension of time to file reply affidavits was denied in part. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.